Wanting State Rights
The United States is on the brink of passing new gambling laws that would
legalize internet gambling at the federal government level thus repealing the
UIGEA and allowing offshore gambling companies access to the US market. The
UIGEA affects the US as a whole, but still allows each individual state to pass
some of their own policies and laws as long as they are intrastate laws that do
not allow gambling across state lines. This is a key piece of the federal laws
that have allowed state governments to consider the legalization of online
casinos and then reap the tax profits off of these gambling companies and
sectors of the market.
The Attorney General of Indiana has sent a letter of objection to the US House
Ways and Means Committee because he stands up for his state's right to decide
which forms of online casino gambling should be legalized in the state. These
states are looking for ways to boost the funds coming into the state coffers and
expanding gambling offerings is a fairly easy and lucrative way for the states
to accomplish this task. Attorney General Greg Zoeller is protecting the state
rights concerning the online casinos and does not want the federal government to
pass any laws that would preempt those rights and usurp individual state laws.
This attitude is actually shared by many politicians in the US who feel like
federal level internet gambling would give the government too much power in the
situation.
Similarly, there are concerns that federal oversight over the online casinos and
betting sectors would create less control in the market. The NFL is dead-set
against the federal legalization of internet betting in the US and has also sent
a letter and expressed this viewpoint to the US House Ways and Means Committee.
These state objections are valid only to an extent because they overlook the
fact that state level legalized gambling does not address the influx and
availability of offshore internet casino sites. |