Motivations Called into Question
The Greek government has long refused to comply with the European Commission’s
request that the country readjust policies and regulations and end the current
land and online casino gambling monopoly in the country that effectively
prevents foreign companies from even remotely entering the market. The Greek
government claims that the state monopoly, OPAP, is in place as a way to keep
Greek citizens safe – that foreign companies do not have the same protections.
In reality though, the blocking of foreign online casinos and land betting
companies is almost wholly about the money and the competition and keeping state
control over all of the gambling money being spent in the country.
That’s the aspect that has online casinos and other EU member-states so irate –
it would be one thing if the foreign internet gambling industry were more
dangerous than a state controlled monopoly, but that is not the case, and not
what the research studies have indicated. A state monopoly means that the
government is able to take a large portion of the gambling revenues for the
state budget and completely monitor access and breadth of the games in the
country. Foreign online casino sites on the other hand are just as safe, but
benefit the whole of the EU economy and the free marketplace rather than one
single country.
The European courts have ruled that there are actually some cases where a
country could justify operating and online casino gambling monopoly for the sake
of protecting gamblers – how to prove the motivations of these companies though
is a whole other ball game. Which countries are genuinely interested in tight
controls to protect gamblers, and which are protecting state revenues? |