Home	Tutorial	Online Casino Reviews	Best Online Casinos	Casino Software	Casino News

Online Casino Gambling --- Casino News

A Name the Difference?

The Kentucky Supreme Court has a pretty tough decision to make this month now that an online casino gambling company named in the case has stepped forward and clearly identified itself in the case. The state SC ruled in default against all of the unnamed domain names because the court held that iMEGA, an advocacy group, did not have the right to represent these online casinos in the court. Instead, the SC ruled in the case for the state in a way, but noted that the domain names affected in the case had three weeks to step up and name themselves – at that point, if an internet gambling company named itself and came forward, the Kentucky Supreme Court would reopen the court case and make a judgment based on the new facts.

The question buzzing in the online casino gambling industry though is whether the addition of a new name in the case is going to make a difference. An internet gambling group, Yatahay Limited, has stepped forward and agreed to wholly identify itself to the courts so that the case can proceed and the court will actually apply Kentucky case law and legislation to the ruling rather than a default judgment. The online casinos believe that they have a pretty good chance of winning the case now that Yatahay Limited has identified itself – to the rest of the world it’s quite clear that the State of Kentucky does not have the right to seize international domain names.

There is a very really chance that this could be the one minor step needed for the gambling industry (and all of the other unnamed online casino domain names) to win the case. Internet censorship is a very serious concern in the global market and the Kentucky Supreme Court would be taking a very huge step by ruling in favor of the State, and thus in favor of international domain name censorship.