Domino Effect for the US
Deciphering the online casino gambling situation in the Untied States is a tough
feat for even the most up-to-date of analysts, but predicting the outcome of all
of the intense political debate about the situation is even more difficult.
Right now, the US is a combination of contradictory and questionable laws
related to internet gambling and in some cases, the enforcement officials are
attempting to use extremely out-dated laws as a scapegoat for enforcing their
will on the US public. The 1960s era Wire Act has no direct connection to the
current world of internet transactions and online casinos – the law was
conceived at a time when the internet was unfathomable and yet the US Department
of Justice has attempted to use the Wire Act to help justify banning and
blocking the internet gambling industry.
The Wire Act is outdated and the UIGEA is highly flawed, yet at the same time,
that’s pretty much all the state and federal governments have to consider when
legislating and regulating the online casino gambling industry. In the past year
that individual state governments have taken a bold and definite step toward
helping the US federal government come to a clear decision on the internet
gambling industry. Several US states have begun to regulate and license internet
betting as a first port of entry into the lucrative internet gambling industry.
The state governments are clearly indicating that they would like the online
casino gambling policies and legislation in the US – even if that means passing
regulations that only apply within state borders. These developments at the
state level are a new consideration for the US government when the internet
gambling issue finds its way to the floor of Congress for discussion. |