The Federal Government's Stance
California is really pushing the boundaries these days with the new bill that
seeks to legalize online casino poker gambling within the state. The federal
government has passed the UIGEA, which is a piece of legislation that seeks to
block offshore online casinos and internet poker companies from accessing the US
market. But what is the difference with the individual state governments
operating a legalized and regulated internet gambling market? Basically, the
carve-outs and federal restrictions have little control over what the state
governments do within the borders of their own state according to some lawyers
and industry analysts. But that just may not be the case – the federal
government has really begun to relax on the implementation of the online casino
gambling restrictions, but there is no telling if the US Department of Justice
will really let this pass happen.
The California government seems confident that if the bill passes through that
it will stand despite any enquiry from the federal government. Another key
factor though that will come into play is the offshore online casino gambling
and poker companies that are being specifically excluded from the US market. The
UIGEA has already caused waves of controversy all over the world and the WTO and
the EU are pressuring the US to repeal the UIGEA and revamp it’s controversial
internet gambling legislation.
The UIGEA is viewed as a piece of protectionist legislation that allows the US
companies to have a corner on all of the online casino, betting, and poker
gambling that occurs in the country. If the California legislation passes it
would just add more fuel to the fire for the foreign companies that are
currently being snubbed. |