Closed Agreement Still Causing Concern
The United States has spent the last two years doing some fancy footwork to get
out of negative situations and issues with other governments about the US’s
foreign online casino gambling policy. The US government negotiated with the EU
for months and months in 2007 and finally came to a sealed resolution that
involved trade compensation benefits for the EU. The only problem with the whole
situation is that the compensation agreement has been sealed to national
security purposes. This has led many supporters of a regulated and open US
online casino gambling industry to raise their voices in concern.
Just what is the US government essentially paying the EU in trade compensations
that could be a matter of national security? Some online casino supporters
speculate that the price was so high that the US Trade Representatives
classified the agreement as such as a way to further protect the UIGEA from
scrutiny. Now though, with the European Union government pressing to US to lift
the ban on foreign online casinos, there is a renewed fervor to find out just
what is in that agreement.
A lot of online casino gamblers and even non-supporters what to know the price
that the US is paying for an protectionist market where the online casinos are
concerned. The sealed compensation agreement is a huge and central concern for
many, but what it really comes down to lately is the fact that the UIGEA is a
flawed piece of legislation that is costing the US a lot of money and efforts.
Protecting the US market from foreign online gambling companies seems to be a
bit of a lost cause and the EU, Antigua, the WTO and a slew of other companies
are demanding that the US government rethink the implementation of the UIGEA and
instead consider a more inclusive and regulated market. |