The Rationalization for Microgaming
Microgaming’s decision to block and ban online casino gamblers from the United
States has been met with criticism by some but more often than not just a bit of
head scratching as to why the company chose to issue the ban right now instead
of two years previously when the UIGEA came into effect. Microgaming actually
game an illuminating statement this week to a journalist for InforPowa. The
company noted that it actually does not dictate policy to the online casinos
licensing Microgaming software, but instead, the company US facing licensees
chose to institute the geoblocking technology, and once there were only a small
number of Microgaming sites accepting US gamblers, the Microgaming chose to make
it a company policy.
Basically, the US banned offshore online casinos from accessing the US market
roughly two years ago and yet many companies remained in the market. But at the
same time, even before the gambling ban, many of Microgaming’s US facing sites
had already chosen to block gamblers from certain US states because of the
individual state legislation. In light of recent events, Microgaming’s licensees
began to accept even fewer US states because of tightening controls in some US
states. At the point that there were only a few online casinos sites without the
US geo-blocking in place, Microgaming discussed with those sites the possibility
of simply blocking certain US states as a Microgaming policy in the effort of
cost savings.
Once those sites agreed Microgaming merely made a company policy that reflected
the actual policies that were already in place at the majority of Microgaming’s
licensees. That is why and how Microgaming came to release the much debated
exclusion list of US states that are geo-blocked at the IP address level from
accessing online gambling sites. |