Giving Teeth to the UIGEA
The United States is in a never ending debate about the 2006 Unlawful Internet
Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA) now the concerns are surfacing about the
proposed regulations for the UIGEA that will serve as guidelines to the
financial institutions. Just months ago the government finally released a set of
proposed guidelines that would give teeth to the UIGEA, which at this time
bans financial transactions between online casinos and the internet gamblers,
and forces the weight of the ban right on the shoulders of the U.S. banking and
financial system. The online casinos ban is a weighty topic all over the world,
and has actually caused some division within the Republican Party which as a
whole supports the UIGEA.
Te UIGEA was passed in October of 2006, and while the online casinos gambling
ban was effective immediately, it took the Bush Administration nearly a year to
release the proposed restrictions and regulations that will flesh out the
details of implementing the controversial ban. The government released the
Proposed Rulemaking as a guideline for the financial and banking industry, and
before sending the rules for final approval, politicians and lobbying groups
have taken the time to review the newly proposed restrictions and criticize
their ability to limit online casinos transactions.
Two Republican Senators actually recently submitted an opinion to the U.S.
Treasure Department that basically alleges that the proposed online casinos
gambling transaction restrictions are not detailed enough and they contend the
restrictions will only cause mass confusion as written.
John Sununu and Pete Domenici wrote in their assessment of the proposed
restrictions, "The extensive public comments received on this issue highlight
the likelihood that risk-averse financial institutions will simply choose to
block every transaction that may be interpreted or could resemble gambling,
whether legal or not. Knowing that this is not your intention, we write to urge
that any final rules contain a list of restricted transactions and instances
that are covered by the law and the corresponding rules.
The two Senators consistently assert that the online casinos gambling
transaction restrictions [leave] sufficient ambiguity as to what sort of
transactions are to be blocked, and that ambiguity will lead to inconsistencies
in implementation across all of the financial industries.
|