Banks on Online Casinos Regulations
The U.S. financial services sector did not have positive things to say about the
U.S. online gambling regulations designed to accompany the Unlawful Internet
Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA). Basically, the Federal Reserve and Treasury
Department along with the U.S. Department of Justice passed the burden of the
UIGEA off to the banks and financial institutions since they were having such a
hard time drafting the regulations. Rather than come to a consensus on what
constitutes illegal online casinos gambling, the regulations leave it to the
banks to delineate between what is and is not legal gambling. Well that just
doesn’t fly with American Bankers Association which sent a representative to
speak at this week’s Congressional hearing.
The ABA spokesperson, Wayne Abernathy, spoke on behalf of all of the U.S. banks
and financial services sectors when noting that “The UIGEA and the Proposed Rule
do not provide a rational path towards halting unlawful Internet gambling." The
U.S. financial sector is already taxed right now because of problems in the U.S.
housing market and increased financial pressures on Americans in terms of rising
fuel and food costs. Then add to that the burdens that the regulations would put
on the banks, and the Abernathy was solidly against the UGIEA regulations in
their current form.
In essence, the online casinos gambling regulations are poorly defined and pass
the buck off to the financial institutions to make decisions that are much
better suited for law enforcement agencies and the U.S. government. Abernathy
continues noting that the regulations "impose significant compliance burdens on
financial institutions by increasing their role in policing illegal activities,
determining whether a transaction is illegal, or by imposing ambiguous
compliance requirements that could be subject to wide variations in
interpretation by regulators and law enforcement agencies. We believe these
functions are more appropriate for law enforcement agencies."
|