What are the Qualifications?: 2
The statement from the European Court of Justice means that online casino
gambling gambling monopolies that are in the business with profit and revenue as
the main concern are illegal under the policies of the European Union. These
markets must allow competition from foreign online casinos. You can guarantee
though that even the state monopolies making hand-over-fist in revenue will
attempt to prove that a state-run monopoly is safer for the public than a
regulated foreign gambling market. Sweden’s monopoly, Svenske Spel has long
argued that the monopoly was in place as a way to protect underage and problem
gamblers. Even though Commissioner Charlie McCreevy has shot down this argument,
the Swedish government asserts that it has the right to block foreign online
casinos from the Swedish market.
McCreevy has not released a statement in response to the ECJ’s official
statement. McCreevy has long asserted that the principles and policies of the
European Union support an open online casino gambling market throughout all of
the member-states. On the other side of the debate, while the ECJ’s statement
notes that there are some circumstances under which a monopoly might be
warrantesd, many online casinos and analysts believe that the ECJ’s statement
was intended to illustrate that the Portuguese internet betting monopoly does
not meet the requirements laid out in the statement.
Some in the online casino gambling industry and in various governments have
interpreted the inverse. In the end though, the decision power on the situation
was given back to the local courts in Portugal to decide. |