Scare Tactics to Block Online Casinos
The opposition to internet gambling is not only resulting to scare tactics as a
way to keep uninformed politicians from legalizing internet gambling, but some
of the information is patently untrue. The major controversy in the online
casino gambling issue right now comes from the defeat of HR 5767 by the House
Financial Services Committee. The Republicans were wholly against HR 5767 and
the King Amendment because of an opposition to online casino gambling – but the
bill’s supporters argue that the Republicans largely missed the entire point and
intention behind the bill. As the media coverage winds down after the intense
coverage yesterday, some of the bill’s supporters are widely criticizing
Republican Congressman Spencer Bachus for providing misinformation about the
U.S. online gambling industry.
Bachus released an op-ed piece in the American Banker earlier this week, and
some of his claims have caused contention among online casino gambling industry
supporters. Bachus’ piece argued for the continued prohibition of U.S. internet
gambling – using the UIGEA, and he used false statistics about the internet
gambling industry as a way to back his claims that the UIGEA protects underage
and problem gamblers.
Republicans are largely opposed to online casino gambling because it can lead to
underage gambling and support the development of problem and compulsive
gamblers. And while the UIGEA would presumably stop offshore internet casinos
from accessing the U.S. market, previous research has shown that internet
gamblers in the U.S. continue to head to the gambling sites in ever increasing
numbers.
Bachus argument included the claim that foreign online casinos left the U.S.
market with the passage of the UIGEA, which then means that internet gamblers
are safer without these companies. On the flip side though is the fact that
although the UIGEA did put a small hitch in the internet gambling levels for a
time, U.S. internet casino gamblers continue to gamble, but now the market is
largely underground and entirely unregulated. HR 5767 and King Amendment
supporters stressed that internet gambling, as regulated by the UIGEA was hugely
ineffective, flawed, unenforceable, and left internet gamblers with a dangerous
black market of internet gambling choices. |