The Online Casinos Are Peeved
European online casino gambling companies are fighting back against the United
States’ protectionist internet gambling policies, and the unfair trade
compensation agreement with the European Union that gave no benefit to the
actual internet gambling companies. European online casinos have petitioned the
Remote Gambling Association (RGA) to pressure the EU to further pursue the
protectionist and hypocritical internet gambling legislation, that specifically
targets offshore online gambling companies from accessing U.S. players – but at
the same time, the U.S. has specific carve-outs that permit forms of domestic
internet gambling activity.
The RGA specifically finds fault with the U.S.’s decision to prosecute the
online casinos that operated in the U.S. prior to the UIGEA. The U.S. government
though claims that the Wire Act of 1960 effectively banned foreign internet
gambling – which is borderline ridiculous really, since the Internet was not
even a concept at that point, so there is no basis in the argument that the
foreign online casino could have possibly known the U.S. government’s stance on
remote gaming based on an outdated and archaic Act.
The U.S. Trade Representatives though are adamant that Wire Act was in place,
and that internet gambling companies knowingly and purposefully offered online
casino gambling activities to U.S. gamblers.
The other major concern for the RGA comes down to the sudden and severe losses
that the EU online casinos faced once the UIGEA was enacted. With the loss of
the U.S. gambling market, many internet gambling companies lost as much as 70
percent of their primary target market, and billions of dollars in share values.
A currently ongoing investigation by the EU officials could shed some more light
on the legality, applicability, and long-term feasibility of the UIGEA. |