They Had the Wrong Focus
Continued strong opposition from Republican is largely to blame for the defeat
of HR 5767 and the King Amendment in this week’s House Financial Services
Committee meeting. HR 5767 had heavy backing from supporters of a U.S. online
casino gambling industry, as well as many Democrats. But HR 5767 went beyond
just addressing the internet gambling issue; coupled with the King Amendment,
the bill would effective put a stop to the flawed, unenforceable, and
controversial UIGEA. HR 5767 was presented by Congressmen Barney Frank and Ron
Paul, and although some had high hopes that the bill would pass, the online
casino gambling industry will have to find another way to neutralize the UIGEA.
According to Frank and Paul, the bill and amendment should have gone above party
lines because it was about more than just addressing foreign online casinos in
the U.S. – the UIGEA is not an effective solution to the internet gambling
debate and HR 5767 and the King Amendment were purely designed to stop the
development of regulations for the flawed UIGEA. The bill and amendment would
not have actually legalized online casino gambling in any way, it was merely
looking more stop UIGEA regulations and then force the government to define and
precisely clarify the difference between legal and illegal internet gambling.
But according to the mainstream media, anti-gambling arguments dominated the
floor while HR 5767 and the King Amendment were under discussion. That is
precisely what the bill’s supporters were pushing to avoid. Alfonse D’Amato,
former Senator and the Chairman of the Poker Players Alliance summarized the
outcome nicely, “Unfortunately, debate over the morality of gambling trumped
debate on the fact that UIGEA is completely ineffective and unenforceable.”
Interestingly though, it was a close call on the voting – the King Amendment
scored a tie-vote, which means that the bill was defeated according to Committee
rules. |