Speaking Out in the Wake of Defeat
Congressman Barney Frank has been very vocal over the past two days, since the
media announced all over the country that the much anticipate HR 5767 bill and
the King Amendment were defeated in a vote by the House Financial Services
Committee. The Committee looked at the issue on Wednesday, but discussions and
debates centered on morality, emotional, and anti-online casino gambling
arguments rather than the specific details within the bill. With the
announcement of a defeat, the online casino gambling industry is left wondering
what is the next step from here?
Barney Franks comments have really revolved around the effect that the bill’s
defeat will have on the banking and financial services sectors. Without HR 5767
in affect, coupled with the King Amendment, the banking industry is strapped
with the very real task of not only defining illegal internet gambling, but then
creating a process to then classify the transactions with online casinos and
block the illegal transactions. Frank observed, "The financial institutions are
in the position of being told not process bets, but it's not clear what is legal
and what is illegal.” The major argument for HR 5767 is to protect the banking
industry from becoming the main enforcement arm of the UIGEA.
To that end, the banking industry fully backs the clarifications that the King
Amendment would have provided for the industry on correctly identifying online
casino gambling transactions. The CEO and president of the Financial Services
Roundtable, Steve Bartlett also noted the undue stress placed on the banking
industry. He remarked, “I wish to be clear that we do not support the notion
that financial services companies should be 'deputized' to police gambling
activity in any form or function. While we would support the passage of H.R.
5767 as introduced, I agree that the King Amendment makes essential improvements
to a deeply flawed law and therefore support its inclusion.”
But even the outspoken support from various industries was not enough to sway
the Republicans, who continued to view HR 5767 and the King Amendment as a black
and white issue of legalizing online casino gambling, rather than attempts to
fix existing problematic legislation. |