Contextualizing EU Laws
The Dutch Supreme Courts have acknowledged that the ongoing online casino
gambling issue is beyond their judgment. The Dutch Supreme Court was tasked with
making a judgment on the ongoing Ladbrokes case. Ladbrokes was forced out of the
Dutch internet gambling market by the state-run monopoly. Protectionist policy
in the Netherlands has specifically targeted foreign online casinos and betting
companies, which the European Commission and many industry analysts contend
flies directly in the face of EU free-trade policies. The Ladbrokes versus De
Lotto case will now make it to the European Court of Justice for a final ruling.
The outcome of the case could severely alter the current political climate
surrounding the internet gambling debate. Nearly a dozen EU member-states
operate an online casino gambling monopoly of some sort, and a ECJ ruling in
favor of Ladbrokes could persuade countries like France, Sweden, and Germany to
begin drafting more inclusive regulations. The threat of ECJ action from the
Gambling Commission has already swayed Greece, Italy, and a few other countries
to begin negotiations with the Commission concerning policies that would affect
foreign online casinos.
The Dutch Supreme Court outlined several areas of concern that the ECJ should
address when it considers the case. One of the prominent questions that the
online casinos industry is anticipating centers on the right of a state-run
gambling monopoly to have measures in place that block a citizen’s access to
foreign gambling sites. This is how De Lotto is blocking Ladbrokes from the
market, by taking Ladbrokes to Dutch courts which then forced Ladbrokes to stop
processing bets from the Netherlands. |