The Funding Effect
Gambling addiction research at Harvard University has been called into question
this week because the land and online casino gambling industries help fund the
research. Studies recently released from the Harvard gambling addiction research
institute indicate that severe gambling addiction is a biological problem within
the individual contends Howard Shaffer, who heads the research institute. But
some of Shaffer’s colleagues fault the research evidence because a large portion
of the funds are actually coming from the land and online casinos.
Shaffer’s latest report on gambling addiction made headlines last week because
it shows that a mere 2 percent of the U.S. population suffer from the most
severe forms of gambling addiction – pathological gamblers. And while this
number is low by some previous estimations, what really causes an uproar with
other contemporaries is the fact that Shaffer’s research implies that
pathological gambling is not caused by the land and online casinos and their
practices and policies, but rather that the individuals have a biological reason
for the addiction.
One critic though, Oliver Staley of the Bloombergs business news, has faulted
Shaffer’s research and claims because of what is called “the funding effect.”
Because the land and online casino gambling companies partly fund the gambling
addiction research Staley asserts that some of the data will come out skewed.
Shaffer though dismisses the notion and notes that not only did he openly
acknowledge where some of the funding came from, but he contends that the land
and online casinos have not been involved in the research process and that his
research institute stands by the integrity of its research results. |