Tribes Contest Latest Proposal
Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick is stirring up a lot
of protest with his proposal that would bring three land-casino resorts to the
state. The fact that Governor Patrick is looking to bring in land gambling is
not the issue for the state tribes – rather the clause in the proposal that
blocks both online casinos gambling and the tribes themselves from running land
casinos. Patrick’s proposal is designed to block any state gambling activities
that would limit the gambling at the three planned resort-style casinos. The
tribes (and the online casino gambling proponents) feel that those restrictions
within the proposal are categorical unfair and have developed a proposal that
would allocate a section of land in Massachusetts for the Mashpee Wanpanoag
Tribe to develop a casino.
Naturally, Governor Patrick is against the Mashpee application – that would
after all create competition with his own three exclusive three land-casino
plans. Patrick’s estimations of revenue from the three resort casinos are
contingent upon there being no other competition from land and online casinos
gambling. And most in the gambling industry already feel his estimations are
grossly overstated as it is, the addition of tribal casino competition would
only mean less taxable revenue for the state.
To counter the Mashpee Tribe’s application for 500 acres of land for a tribal
casino, the Patrick’s administration developed and delivered a 125 page response
to the tribe’s application that basically asserts that the state would be better
served by Patrick’s exclusive three land casino resorts. Patrick notes, in
response to the proposal, "The process that the tribe is involved in does not
take into account the interest of the whole of the commonwealth. Our proposal
does. The question is whether this is going to be done to us, or whether we are
going to influence and shape casinos, whether they are Indian casinos or not, in
ways that respond to all of our best interests." And while some might say that
Patrick has a valid point, I’m not buying it.
|