Wire Act Sticks for Online Casinos
The announcement that one of Party Gaming’s founding members, Anurag Dikshit,
actually accepted a plea agreement related to the US’s archaic Wire Act
legislation is really a turning point for the US Department of Justice. The DoJ
is consistently attempting to charge several online casinos and executives with
criminal charges related to the Wire Act…and while many assumed that the
attempts would never actually lead to charges – Dikshit’s huge payment and
guilty plea may actually give the Wire Act the strength it needs to implicate
Party Gaming, 888 Holdings, and a slew of online casino gambling executives in
criminal activities prior to the passage of the UIGEA.
Dikshit’s decision to plead guilty to one charge against the Wire Act has really
had tongues wagging in the online caisno gambling industry. Dikshit, and his
company Party Gaming, have been in negotiations with the DoJ for more than 18
months at this point and until the past week, there was little indication of
Dikshit’s decision with the DoJ. Part of the reason that few in the industry
believed the rumors about Dikshit’s guilty plea and huge fine stems from the
fact that few online casinos and executives have given much credence to the
DoJ’s decision to prosecute companies and individuals on Wire Act charges.
The Wire Act dates back to 1961 and was passed in the US as a way to stop
telephone betting – the passage has no specific implication for the online
caisno gambling industry, and, in fact, was written and passed long before the
internet was even a viable concept in the world wide community. But Dikshit’s
decision to plead guilty and pay means that other’s in the same predicament may
have lost some of their bargaining power. |