Criminalizing the Online Casinos
Comedy is often the best vehicle for criticism pretty much anywhere in the
world, but particularly in the United States where freedom of speech means that
even scathing commentaries and opinions are protected from persecution. Blogger
Jacob Sullum recently published a piece on the Reason blog that highlighted some
of the more ridiculous parts of the US online casino gambling situation –
everything from arresting executives and then not providing an immediate trial
to fining foreign online casinos huge sums of money for violating what amounts
to hugely ambiguous internet gambling legislation.
Sullum’s piece is particularly positive for the online casino gambling industry
– he criticizes all of the loopholes and obstacles that the US government has
put in front of the internet gambling companies – and then fined them for when
they violate. Before the 2006 UIGEA the US’s stance on online casino gambling
was largely unclear and the internet gambling companies had no way of knowing
that the US DoJ would later use the archaic Wire Act as a standing ground for
huge fines.
Sullum’s piece really examines the current situation of Anurag Dikshit’s guilty
plea on Wire Act charges. Dikshit pled guilty, and even released a statement
that he believes that he did in fact violate US law by offering online casinos
prior to the UIGEA. But even in his admission, it has to be said that the US’s
stance on gambling was ambiguous at best. Sullum’s piece goes on to note that
the US government is creating criminals from innocent men and also raising huge
capital with the fines – why not just license, regulate, and tax the industry
and collect the revenue that way without implicating a slew of gambling
executives from all over the world – most of whom do not even reside in the US. |