Main Contention for Online Casino Sites
The international internet gambling industry has really taken exception to the
recent developments in the US’s negotiations concerning the Wire Act. The Wire
Act was designed to apply specifically to telephone sportsbetting; even if the
one were to stretch the application of the Wire Act, it would, at most, then
apply to internet sportsbetting. The US Department of Justice though insists
that the Wire Act has applicability to online casino gambling in the US prior to
the implementation of the controversial UIGEA – this is where foreign online
casinos are expressing outrage – along with the biased prosecution.
The European Union has already launched an inquiry into the US’s continued
prosecution of online casinos that operated in the US pre-UIGEA…the US though is
entirely unsupportive of the investigation and refuses to take a pause in the
continued negotiations and prosecution of pre-UIGEA online casino activity.
The RGA sent a letter of outrage to EU and WTO authorities highlighted some of
the major concerns and really pinpointing the main contention by online casinos
and internet gambling companies. The RGA statement notes, "This is the first
time this Act has been applied to Internet gambling beyond sports-betting.” The
letter continues to note that online casinos are facing heavy fines in the US
“despite never offering sports-betting and ceasing to accept US customers
for…poker and casino games when the still-controversial Unlawful Internet
Gambling Enforcement Act 2006 was passed.
The US DoJ has really only targeted a handful of European online casinos that
are looking to handle these negotiations completely above-board. Many internet
gambling companies that operated in the US prior to the UIGEA are not facing DoJ
legal action – this spotty prosecution of online gambling companies is raising
hackles. |