A Weak Support Argument
Last week’s Congressional hearing clearly indicated that there are some serious
issues surrounding the proposed regulations for the U.S. online casinos gambling
ban, the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA). And while those in
opposition to the UIGEA and strongly against the regulations presented a
compelling case against the continuance of the UIGEA, the proponents didn’t
really have much to say. Congressman Spencer Bachus (R - AL) was really the only
proponent at the hearing, and instead of presenting a list of facts and
information to support a need to online casinos gambling regulation in the
United States, his argument was largely unconvincing and cited an old case that
many feel grows more irrelevant by the day.
A core part of Bachus’ supporting argument for the online casinos gambling ban
centers on what comes down to an opinion, and one that, honestly, he will have a
hard time backing up. He remarks, “Illegal Internet gambling is a scourge on our
society that leads to addiction and gambling addicts then turn to crime to
support their habit.” Naturally the opposition to the internet gambling ban was
able to note that the UK and other nations have a fully regulated online casinos
gambling industry that has managed to largely control criminal and illegal
activity.
Bachus also brought up the problems of underage online casinos gambling and used
the news story from years ago that had an underage gambler – a teenager, who
robbed a bank because of internet gambling debt. That story is largely
unimpressive and internet technology today is only increasingly becoming able to
protect and block underage gamblers.
And Bachus’ strongest argument came in the form of a letter that included the
names of 45 U.S. Attorney Generals who support the UIGEA. But other than those
45 names supporting Bachus and his position on online gambling, there were few
other voices that had anything positive to note about the ban and the effect on
domestic and foreign relations.
|