U.S. Online Casinos Hypocritical
Elements of the U.S. Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA) have
long been criticized as not only hypocritical, but in violation of international
trade policies. The only individuals that fail to see the hypocrisy are,
unfortunately, the U.S. Trade Representatives. The USTR and a handful of
Congressmen and politicians stand behind the UIGEA and its wide-sweeping ban on
foreign and offshore online casinos gambling operators. A recent article in the
prominent U.S. business journal, the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) highlighted the
current international problems that the UIGEA has created and also noted that
Barney Frank’s bill is actually right on target for resolving some international
issues that the UIGEA has created.
The WSJ article noted that consensus in the U.S. government and banking sectors
finds that the UIGEA is not only unenforceable, but even if enforced will be
largely ineffective. The article also points out some of the problems that the
U.S. has encountered in the international arena between the WTO and other
nations voicing discrimination concerns.
The article notes, "Brussels is making a narrow legal point that Washington
discriminates against Europeans by simultaneously permitting U.S. Internet horse
betting. That's against World Trade Organization rules.”
Interestingly, the U.S. is flat out not practicing what they preach. “Washington
is also practicing a form of universal jurisdiction by applying domestic law to
foreigners beyond its borders – a legal interpretation that the U.S. has,
rightly, condemned in other cases." That is an important point that shows that
the U.S.’s current online casinos gambling legislation is not only hypocritical,
but could cause international problems if not appropriately addressed. |