Further Angering Other Countries
The United States is at the forefront of criticism for other nations all over
the world for blatantly protectionist legislation related to online casinos
gambling. In October 2006, the United States Congress passed the Unlawful
Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA) a piece of legislation that
specifically bans foreign and offshore internet gambling companies from
operating legally in the U.S. market – the Act basically prohibits the U.S.
financial industry from processing payments from the online casinos. Many
nations are seeking compensation from the U.S. for alterations in international
trade policy, and the World Trade Organisation (WTO) is involved in mediating
many of the disputes. But what could really change the face of the arguments and
debate against the current U.S. policy is a newly proposed bill out of
California concerning state-run online casinos poker gambling.
Right now, the UGIEA is highly controversial in the international online casinos
gambling industry because the Act openly defied trade policies at the time by
creating a veritable gambling monopoly for U.S. internet gambling businesses.
What angered many nations (particularly Antigua and the European Union is the
fact that the UIGEA had carve-outs for forms of state-run online gambling
operators such as Fantasy Sports leagues and horserace betting and the foreign
and offshore online casinos gambling and betting companies are specifically and
unfairly excluded from that market.
The debates on the Constitutionality of the UIGEA are rampant in the U.S. and
most politicians and those affected by the UIGEA agree that the Act is
fundamentally flawed and that the U.S. would be better served by a regulated and
licensed online casinos gambling industry that allowed foreign and offshore
operators access to the market. But while the many in the U.S. push to
neutralize the internet gambling industry, the proposed legalization of online
poker gambling in California could actually create a crisis situation of sorts
where foreign internet gambling operators are even more angered by the
limitations placed on foreign operators and protectionist legislation. |