Semantics in the Online Casino Industry
Recently the Swedish government has reported to the European Commission exactly
why Sweden ought to be exempted from European Union policies regarding the
movement of free trade. The crux of the problem began when a few of the EU
countries allowed only a government monopoly over the country’s online casino
and internet gaming industry. EU policies ensure that all countries within the
Union have open access to the economy within other countries. But the European
Commission (EC) was forced to get involved in the situation when Germany,
France, and Sweden all refused to budge on their online casinos regulations and
policies.
Sweden specifically is causing the most concern in the EU because of the
government’s absolute refusal to budge even one inch – despite questionable
justifications for the severe online casinos restrictions. The Swedish
government operates the country’s one online casino, betting, and gambling
company – Svenske Spel; no other internet gambling companies have access to the
Swedish market.
The EC claimed that Sweden was acting contrary to established EU policies and
asked all countries with these exclusionary practices toward internet gambling
and online casinos to provide the Commission with justification. The Swedish
government justifies the monopoly with assertions that it prevents criminal
activity, protects Swedish players, and is generally proportionate legislation.
Others though look at the increasingly high revenues that Svenske Spel reports
each quarter and speculate that the justification truly lies in continuing to
corner the country’s online casino industry for as long as possible. |