Trust Tackles Problem Gambling
With the results from the UK’s latest Gambling Prevalence Study in some
organizations are seizing on recent media attitudes toward the online casino
industry as a way to precipitate more funding for problem gambling programs. The
Responsibility in Gaming Trust (RIGT) was formed as a way to assess, research,
treat, and prevent gambling addictions in the UK. And though the media attention
preceding the release of the Prevalence Study was unjustly negative (and had
many online casinos companies worried about further government action and
regulations), the Trust is still using the current media focus on problem
gambling as a way to raise additional millions of dollars to go toward
preventing future gambling related problems in the UK.
RIGT is committed to making a difference in the prevention, treatment, and
education of those affected by the gambling industry – both online casino and
land-based gambling. The UK’s new pressure for the online casinos industry to
act socially responsible is actually right in line with the attitude of those at
RIGT as well. A Chairman at RIGT, John Greenway, comments, “Just treating those
who already have a problem is doing too little, too late. We need to take a more
preventative approach and educate people about the risks of gambling.”
More and more online casinos and other gambling organizations have alternatives
to the older methods of monitoring internet gambling. Recently announced
“opt-out” programs are coupled with advanced computer technology that recognizes
and flags internet gamblers in at all stages of gambling addiction. These new
programs put a lot of responsibility on the online casino companies to take the
initiative and outlay the money and manpower to support problem gambling
programs.
RIGT notes that though the percentage of problem gamblers at the online casinos
has not increased, the numbers are still too high and should be controlled.
Greenway continues, "We are already spending ten times more on tackling problem
gambling than in 2000, and we had previously called for a further doubling of
our income by 2010. But we feel that even that is not enough."
|