Will Antigua Retaliate?
The United States has really only just entered into serious negotiations with
the World Trade Organization and the eight countries with valid claims seeking
compensation as a result of the U.S.’s offshore online casino ban. These talks
are a result of several years of WTO court cases from Antigua claiming that the
U.S. policies regarding only inter-state horserace betting defied international
trading treaties. The U.S. fought the case, yet the WTO ruled in favor of
Antigua. And though the issue of betting has been an issue since 2003, the WTO’s
ruling was specifically related to the U.S. policies regarding betting. Then,
just a year ago the U.S. passed an off-shore online casino ban that heightened
the global case against the U.S. and has created one of the largest cases the
WTO has ever handled.
Once the U.S. passed the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA),
however, the issue escalated as the UIGEA devastated the Antiguan economy.
Initially, the U.S. refused to acknowledge that the UIGEA violated treaty
agreements, and then in May, the U.S. chose to amend, or rather clarify, the
1994 treaty that granted other countries access to the U.S. online casino and
gambling markets. And for months the U.S. asserted that the clarification meant
that the U.S. was no longer at fault and no longer accountable to the global
online casino gambling industry.
In the interim though – in the time that the U.S. has refused to work with
Antigua, the Antiguan government has already begun to plan retaliatory measures.
These threats from the Antiguan government center on the power of U.S. copyright
laws rather than the online casino industry. Antigua’s “cross-retaliation” plans
would amount to roughly $3.4 billion in damages to U.S. companies in Silicon
Valley and Hollywood should the country ignore copyright protections on American
software, music, movies, and more. Antigua is currently pressing the issue the
WTO and awaiting the opportunity or need for such drastic actions.
|