The Case Continues
The New Jersey court last month was the site of what could be a landmark case in
the ongoing debate about the constitutionality of the Unlawful Internet Gambling
Enforcement Act (UIGEA). The act was an effective ban on offshore online casinos
and stifled the personal freedoms of Americans by limiting internet activities
within the privacy of American homes. And beyond even that, the global online
casinos industry was devastated by the U.S. withdrawal of internet gambling. The
Internet Media Entertainment Gambling Association (iMEGA) was the first U.S.
group to actively challenge the validity of the online casino ban in U.S. court.
The case was held last month in a New Jersey U.S. District Court, and shortly
after the hearing, iMEGA released another public statement concerning the groups
position on the UIGEA.
Commenting on the day of the hearing, iMEGA released a statement as they awaited
the action of the Honorable Mary L. Cooper and the Court. The President of iMEGA,
Edward J. Leyden, commented that the stated intention of the online casino ban
is not actually met through the Act, and in fact causes more harm than good. He
notes, "We agree that children and problem gamblers need protection. We know
that technology is available that will accomplish this. This law - in addition
to being defective and unconstitutional - will not provide greater protections.
In fact, it will only make these groups more vulnerable.”
And as for future actions within the online casino industry, iMEGA’s statement
suggests that "an immediate congressional review of the numerous pieces of
legislation that address the issue of online gaming and recommends passage of
new laws that ensure safe Internet use, protect U.S. Internet leadership and
promote the Internet as a bastion of innovation."
|