Advocating Regulations
Compromise, in terms of U.S. and EU compensation negotiations, is certainly
preferred over what is currently happening - frequently postponed deadlines and
neither side wholly conceding and ending the negotiations. But for the European
Union, compromising on the compensation negotiations regarding the U.S. online
casinos ban is just one option. Alternative options include approaches to the
U.S. Congress to end the negotiations by passing legislation that would regulate
and license online casino gambling in the United States. The EU Trade
Commissioner Peter Mandelson has spent his week in Washington speaking with
politicians and members of Congress who similarly feel that passing new
legislation is the most effective way to end both end the compensation
negotiations with other countries, and to end the U.S.’s ongoing issues with the
World Trade Organisation (WTO).
Mandelson commented to U.S. reporters, "What we need to see is a change in U.S.
legislation that removes that discrimination against EU operators." This is the
key element of Mandelson’s reasons for coming to the U.S. The Trade
Representatives are just not willing to budge on fair compensation for the loss
of the U.S. online casino gambling market, so Mandelson has instead directly
approached the U.S. Congress and policymakers.
The U.S. withdrew trade commitments from the previous WTO treaties on the
grounds that the U.S. never intended for online casino gambling to be included
in the international trade agreements. Mandelson though, and many other
countries don’t accept that rationale as either appropriate or a legitimate
reason for the U.S. to disregard online casinos compensation claims from the
majority of the countries that have filed claims with the WTO. Mandelson notes,
"When a member of the WTO defaults on its commitments, compensation is due.
That's the case of online casino gambling."
|