An Unbiased Look: THE EUROPEAN UNION AND BRAZIL
After the dispute panel met in Geneva, Switzerland, and the United States gave
no indication that it plans to provide compensation to affected companies, the
Brazilian delegation and the European Union announced their unequivocal support
of the small island of Antigua. Though Brazil does not have a noticeable
interest in the online casino gambling industry, the country feels that the
issue with the U.S. goes beyond merely online casinos and into global policy and
respect. The on the other hand is heavily involved in internet gambling, and
could seek compensation along with Antigua.
Many other countries, like India, agree with the WTO’s initial ruling that found
that the U.S. needed to either amend the restrictions placed on offshore online
casino companies, or provide Antigua and other affected countries with the
specified compensation clause that comes into effect if a country alters global
agreements. And though the U.S. is attempting to circumvent the need to
compensate other countries, both Brazil and the EU have pledged to support
Antigua, and global interests until this issue is resolved.
For the E.U., many UK counties lost huge revenue when the anti-online casinos
legislation passed; so it is anticipated that the E.U. has a valid claim at
being rewarded damages.
Most outside countries are wondering why the U.S. expects that the rest of the
global community will accept that U.S. companies are still allowed to run online
casinos and offshore betting sites as long as the sites do not service U.S.
citizens. The countries are claiming that the U.S.’s ban specifically
discriminates against foreign companies.
|