European Monopolies try to Justify
The problem with European monopolies does not seem to be lessening as the issue
benefits from increased awareness. Monopolies are a problem within all areas of
the internet gambling industry from the online casinos to betting. Right now,
the European Commission is addressing complaints from countries within the
European Economic Area because of monopolies in Sweden, Germany, France, and
other countries. The pro-monopoly debate is becoming increasingly debunked as
online casinos and betting industry analysts weigh in on the issue and counter
the many popular arguments.
The latest group to put forth an opinion in the online casinos and internet
betting monopolies is the Remote Gaming Association (RGA). The RGA has countered
a new claim from gaming monopolies that asserts that running a government
monopoly lessens the likelihood for corruption. Other popular arguments for the
use of government monopolies asserts that the monopoly is in place as a way to
protect the morals of the players and to address underage and problem gambling.
The counter to this though is the fact that the online casinos industry in the
UK and the European Union is often regulated more closely and with stricter
restrictions than many of the government run monopolies. Because of the
potential for corruption and criminal activity within the online casinos
industry, the EU, and many other remote gambling licensing organizations have
put regulations that greatly reduce the ability for fraudulent activity to
flourish in the industry.
The RGA CEO, Clive Hawkswood, contends that the sports corruption argument is
largely just a bonus claim from the online casinos and betting monopolies that
is a way for them to protect their own interests rather than asserting the truth
of the situation, which is that private betting sites and companies are
“regulated to the same standard as state monopolies, if not better,” comments
Hawkswood.
|